LARGE SMALL Video Size:
The latest version of Adobe Flash Player is required to watch video. Get Flash Now
An update to Veoh Web Player is required to watch this   video.
This update improves video playback performance and also includes many quality and stability enhancements. Update Web Player

Comments

Videos > More Videos like "Mark Driscoll vs Joel Osteen - Are they Different? No."

  • Videos
  • /
  • More Videos like "Mark Driscoll vs Joel Osteen - Are they Different? No."
Mark Driscoll vs Joel Osteen - Are they Different? No. 09:59

Reformed minister Mark Driscoll claims to be above the Arminianism of Joel Osteen. But is it so? Driscoll says that we are required to do things in order to be saved. E.g. a "heartfelt commitment", "an embracing" and "forsaking sin" are all requirements. In fact, these works must be performed by someone BEFORE they have faith IN ORDER for them to get faith. Apparently, dead unbelievers must pray their way into life! Contary to this, Scripture says that an unbeliever's "prayers", "seeking", "repentance" and "turning from sin" -- all these things are sin (Rom 10:14). In fact, all their feelings of "remorse", "regret", "guilt", "sorrow" must be sin. Any attempt to be "humble" or "sincerely turn from sin", is in fact sin. Because all the unbeliever's works are works of unbelief. If they try to be sincerely "seeking salvation", it's because they don't think Christ was sincere enough. By "seeking faith in order to be saved", an unbeliever shows they think they are capable to "finishing off" what Christ ...

category: 
News
from:
andrewcbain
views:
174
added:
2 yrs ago
language:
English
Advertisement
  • RC Sproul Debates Greg Bahnsen on Apologetics 09:59 RC Sproul Debates Greg Bahnsen on Apologetics

    http://Godnoliar.com/Sproul_vs_Bahnsen.htm BAHNSEN SHOWS THAT SPROUL IS AN AGNOSTIC. Bahnsen said: If you have only probability – if you have only probability that the Bible is the Word of God, or that God exists or all the rest – that must mean at least this – that while there are many reasons to think that the Bible is the Word of God, there are some to think that it’s not. As, if there were no reasons to think that the Bible’s not the Word of God, it wouldn’t be probability it would be certainty. And so when RC [Sproul] or any old Princeton Apologist says, “That very probably the Bible is the Word of God,” he is also saying there’s a slight probability that it’s not – slight. You may think the probability that it is, is greater than the other – although, I dare say, nobody knows how to rate probability, when it comes to those kind of arguments. So saying one is more than the other doesn’t get anywhere ...

    by:
    andrewcbain
    views:
    190
    added:
    2 yrs ago
    language:
    en
  • Joel Osteen Affirms Mormonism 01:22 Joel Osteen Affirms Mormonism

    Another Word of Faith leader promoting false doctrine.

    by:
    hydwen
    views:
    807
    added:
    12 mos ago
    language:
    en