LARGE SMALL Video Size:
The latest version of Adobe Flash Player is required to watch video. Get Flash Now
An update to Veoh Web Player is required to watch this   video.
This update improves video playback performance and also includes many quality and stability enhancements. Update Web Player

Comments

Videos > More Videos like "9/11: LET'S GET EMPIRICAL - David Ray Griffin"

9/11: LET'S GET EMPIRICAL - David Ray Griffin 1:55:53

In this talk, based on his book Debunking 9/11 Debunking, Griffin rebuts Popular Mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory. Pointing out that most objections to the alternative theory, according to which 9/11 was an inside job, are based on purely a priori arguments and a propagandistic use of the term “conspiracy theory,” he shows that if we get empirical about 9/11, we can quickly see that the official story cannot be true. - Generously illustrated with graphics and video clips. Also includes 30 minutes of Q & A.

Advertisement
  • David Ray Griffin's talk based on his book "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" brilliantly rebuts Popular Mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory, and shows how their arguments do not stand up to empirical analysis. Please support authors by buying DVD. http://911tv.org


    by:
    ottawafro
    views:
    3,781
    added:
    12 mos ago
    language:
    en
  • Kevin Ryan, former lab manager and scientist at Underwriters Labs, the company that tested the steel used in the World Trade Center buildings, was fired by UL when he went public with information about the cover-up. He explains in detail why the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report on the World Trade Center collapses is false. He shows that their investigation was deceptive and unscientific at every step. Further, he points out that the reported findings, based on wildly overdriven computer simulation, were in direct contradiction to their physical testing! The UL models of the World Trade Center did not collapse under any test conditions! This talk was given in Chicago on June 4, 2005, at the 9/11: Revealing the Truth/Reclaiming Our Future conference.


    by:
    stoplying
    views:
    131
    added:
    8 mos ago
    language:
    en
  • This logical, methodical explanation of the big picture is perfectly, meticulously delivered.


    by:
    stoplying
    views:
    401
    added:
    12 mos ago
    language:
    en
  • David Ray Griffin's talk based on his book "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" brilliantly rebuts Popular Mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory, and shows how their arguments do not stand up to empirical analysis. Question and Answer Segment. Please support authors by buying DVD. http://911tv.org


    by:
    ottawafro
    views:
    714
    added:
    12 mos ago
    language:
    en
  • Calum Douglas presents his investigation into the flight data recorder from Flight 77 to an audience at the Indian YMCA in Fitzroy Square, London on 8th June 2007. Updated 26th June 2007 with introduction and phone call transcripts. DVD of this along with a presentation by Gordon Ross about the destruction of the World Trade Center can be bought from http://rinf.com/infoshop/flight77.php


    by:
    stoplying
    views:
    1,078
    added:
    12 mos ago
    language:
    en
  • Session 2 of "Lifting the fog: the scientific method applied to the world trade center disaster" - a one day conference held on November 11, 2006 at the University of California Berkeley Campus. Information about the conference is at LiftingTheFog.org. What can be learned from analysis of the physical features of the total destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7? Are there natural processes that could explain these features? Presenter is Steven Jones, Ph.D., former (recently retired) Professor of Physics at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah, and author of numerous peer-reviewed research papers, including Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse?


    by:
    stoplying
    views:
    756
    added:
    12 mos ago
    language:
    en
  • Session three for "Lifting the fog: the scientific method applied to the world trade center disaster" - a one day conference held on November 11, 2006 at the University of California Berkeley Campus. Information about the conference is at LiftingTheFog.org. What are the official collapse theories? Can they account for the total collapses and for specific features documented by physical evidence? How scientific were the investigations that produced these theories? Presenter is: Jim Hoffman, M.F.A., Former research scientist, published in Science and Macromolecules for research in polymer physics, and Communications of the ACM for visualization software, and creator of 9-11 Research, the highest-ranking website challenging the core tenets of the official story of 9/11. Slides at tinyurl.com/yukzjf


    by:
    stoplying
    views:
    919
    added:
    12 mos ago
    language:
    en
  • B.Y.U. Professor Steven E. Jones, P.h.D. 9/11 Breaking The Laws Of Physics (Feb.1st .2006) : http://www.journalof911studies.com On Wednesday, February 1 2006 Dr. Steven Jones gave this presentation on 9/11 and the physics of falling bodies and how it was physically impossible for these structures to have collapsed based on the conclusion that our government has given us.


    by:
    InsideJob911
    views:
    1,482
    added:
    12 mos ago
    language:
    en
  • A video presentation by Spencer Morgan of www.Utah911truth.com


    by:
    InsideJob911
    views:
    3,439
    added:
    12 mos ago
    language:
    en
Advertisement

Dos Equis Survival