In this talk, based on his book Debunking 9/11 Debunking, Griffin rebuts Popular Mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory. Pointing out that most objections to the alternative theory, according to which 9/11 was an inside job, are based on purely a priori arguments and a propagandistic use of the term “conspiracy theory,” he shows that if we get empirical about 9/11, we can quickly see that the official story cannot be true. - Generously illustrated with graphics and video clips. Also includes 30 minutes of Q & A.
David Ray Griffin's talk based on his book "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" brilliantly rebuts Popular Mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory, and shows how their arguments do not stand up to empirical analysis. Please support authors by buying DVD. http://911tv.org
Session three for "Lifting the fog: the scientific method applied to the world trade center disaster" - a one day conference held on November 11, 2006 at the University of California Berkeley Campus. Information about the conference is at LiftingTheFog.org. What are the official collapse theories? Can they account for the total collapses and for specific features documented by physical evidence? How scientific were the investigations that produced these theories? Presenter is: Jim Hoffman, M.F.A., Former research scientist, published in Science and Macromolecules for research in polymer physics, and Communications of the ACM for visualization software, and creator of 9-11 Research, the highest-ranking website challenging the core tenets of the official story of 9/11. Slides at tinyurl.com/yukzjf
A video presentation by Spencer Morgan of www.Utah911truth.com
Comments